State of Maharashtra vs Laxman Vasant Kamble — 2128/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120016322023
Filing Number
1632/2023
Filing Date
27-Jun-2023
Registration No
2128/2024
Registration Date
27-Jun-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
107
Police Station
Aurad Shahajani
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Laxman Vasant Kamble
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court discharged accused Laxman Vasant Kamble under Section 258 of the CrPC in a case filed under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was granted because multiple summons failed to locate the accused, no CA report was received, and further proceedings would serve no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
10-Mar-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
23-Dec-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
20-Sep-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
18-Jun-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
12-Mar-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
23-Nov-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
20-Nov-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
08-Aug-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
26-Apr-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
07-Nov-2023
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
14-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 2128/2024
The court discharged accused Laxman Vasant Kamble under Section 258 of the CrPC in a case filed under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was granted because multiple summons failed to locate the accused, no CA report was received, and further proceedings would serve no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts