State of Maharashtra vs Annarao alias Annappa Gundappa Mekale — 555/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),65(f). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120016272025

Filing Number

958/2025

Filing Date

17-Jun-2025

Registration No

555/2025

Registration Date

17-Jun-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

256

Police Station

Kasar sirsi

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),65(f)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Annarao alias Annappa Gundappa Mekale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Annarao Mekale from charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act (Section 65(f)(e)) and stopped the case under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023. The court found that despite multiple summons, the accused could not be traced, the CA report was not received, and continuing the case would serve no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 26-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 05-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 555/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Annarao Mekale from charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act (Section 65(f)(e)) and stopped the case under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023. The court found that despite multiple summons, the accused could not be traced, the CA report was not received, and continuing the case would serve no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case