State of Maharashtra vs Santosh Shivappa Ghote — 529/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),68(a)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120015902025

Filing Number

929/2025

Filing Date

16-Jun-2025

Registration No

529/2025

Registration Date

16-Jun-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

103

Police Station

Excise Department, Udgir

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),68(a)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Shivappa Ghote

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 529/2025 The court discharged accused Santosh Shivappa Ghote from charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act (Sections 65(e), 68(a)(b)) after multiple failed summons, inability to trace the accused, and non-receipt of the Investigating Officer's report. The court invoked Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, finding that keeping the case pending served no purpose. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and seized materials ordered disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 25-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 03-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 529/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 529/2025 The court discharged accused Santosh Shivappa Ghote from charges under the Bombay Prohibition Act (Sections 65(e), 68(a)(b)) after multiple failed summons, inability to trace the accused, and non-receipt of the Investigating Officer's report. The court invoked Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, finding that keeping the case pending served no purpose. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and seized materials ordered disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case