State of Maharashtra vs Ranjit Shrirang Biradar — 505/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120015092025

Filing Number

889/2025

Filing Date

10-Jun-2025

Registration No

505/2025

Registration Date

10-Jun-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

Aurad Shahajani

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ranjit Shrirang Biradar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Ranjit Shrirang Biradar under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The magistrate found that multiple summons failed to locate the accused, the Chargeability Analysis report was not received, and further delay was unwarranted. The bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 29-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 26-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 24-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 505/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Ranjit Shrirang Biradar under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023, in a case involving charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The magistrate found that multiple summons failed to locate the accused, the Chargeability Analysis report was not received, and further delay was unwarranted. The bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case