State of Maharashtra vs Dnyaneshwar Bhaurao Suryavanshi — 447/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120013982025
Filing Number
793/2025
Filing Date
21-May-2025
Registration No
447/2025
Registration Date
21-May-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
103
Police Station
Aurad Shahajani
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dnyaneshwar Bhaurao Suryavanshi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged accused Dnyaneshwar Bhaurao Suryavanshi under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023, in a case filed under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was granted because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the chargesheet analysis report was not received, and further delay would serve no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
20-Feb-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
28-Oct-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
08-Aug-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
10-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 447/2025
The court discharged accused Dnyaneshwar Bhaurao Suryavanshi under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023, in a case filed under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was granted because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the chargesheet analysis report was not received, and further delay would serve no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts