State of Maharashtra vs Shankar Pratap Surwase — 2698/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120013822024
Filing Number
1382/2024
Filing Date
16-May-2024
Registration No
2698/2024
Registration Date
16-May-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
Excise Department, Udgir
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shankar Pratap Surwase
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court discharged accused Shankar Pratap Surwase under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving alleged violation of Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was ordered due to the accused's inability to be traced despite multiple summons, non-receipt of the CA report, and the court's finding that further delay would serve no purpose. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and seized material was ordered disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
13-Feb-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
16-Oct-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
23-Jul-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
21-Apr-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
18-Dec-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
20-Nov-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
30-Aug-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
13-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2698/2024
The court discharged accused Shankar Pratap Surwase under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving alleged violation of Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was ordered due to the accused's inability to be traced despite multiple summons, non-receipt of the CA report, and the court's finding that further delay would serve no purpose. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and seized material was ordered disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts