State of Maharashtra vs Narsing Vitthal Torasale — 2624/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120013222024
Filing Number
1322/2024
Filing Date
06-May-2024
Registration No
2624/2024
Registration Date
06-May-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
432
Police Station
Excise Department, Latur
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Narsing Vitthal Torasale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Narsing Vitthal Torasale under Section 258 CrPC in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case due to the accused remaining untraceable despite multiple summons and failure of police to apprehend him. The court found that further pendency served no purpose and authorized discharge subject to Section 300(5) CrPC, cancelled bail bonds, and ordered disposal of seized contraband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
27-Feb-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
09-Dec-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
28-Oct-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
11-Aug-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
22-Apr-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
18-Dec-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
20-Nov-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
28-Aug-2024
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
20-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2624/2024
The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Narsing Vitthal Torasale under Section 258 CrPC in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case due to the accused remaining untraceable despite multiple summons and failure of police to apprehend him. The court found that further pendency served no purpose and authorized discharge subject to Section 300(5) CrPC, cancelled bail bonds, and ordered disposal of seized contraband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts