State of Maharashtra vs Laxman Ram Parale — 395/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120012202025

Filing Number

693/2025

Filing Date

24-Apr-2025

Registration No

395/2025

Registration Date

24-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

44

Police Station

Excise Department, Latur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Laxman Ram Parale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Laxman Ram Parale (395/2025) The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an alleged Bombay Prohibition Act violation (Section 65(e)) after multiple failed attempts to serve summons and the accused remaining untraceable. The court found it futile to keep the case pending without the accused's presence or a Forensic report, and ordered cancellation of bail bonds and disposal of seized contraband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 27-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 28-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 08-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 395/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Laxman Ram Parale (395/2025) The court discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for an alleged Bombay Prohibition Act violation (Section 65(e)) after multiple failed attempts to serve summons and the accused remaining untraceable. The court found it futile to keep the case pending without the accused's presence or a Forensic report, and ordered cancellation of bail bonds and disposal of seized contraband. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case