State of Maharashtra vs Avinash Dattatraya Gomsale — 387/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120012022025
Filing Number
684/2025
Filing Date
23-04-2025
Registration No
387/2025
Registration Date
24-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
58
Police Station
Excise Department, Latur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Avinash Dattatraya Gomsale
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Nilanga
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 25-11-2025 | Appearance |
| 28-08-2025 | Appearance |
| 08-05-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Avinash Dattatraya Gomsale (387/2025) The court discharged accused Avinash Dattatraya Gomsale from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023. The discharge was ordered because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the chargesheet analysis report was not received, and further delay served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Avinash Dattatraya Gomsale (387/2025) The court discharged accused Avinash Dattatraya Gomsale from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023. The discharge was ordered because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the chargesheet analysis report was not received, and further delay served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts