State of Maharashtra vs Vishal Ramesh Jadhav — 373/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120011592025
Filing Number
662/2025
Filing Date
21-04-2025
Registration No
373/2025
Registration Date
21-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
Aurad Shahajani
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vishal Ramesh Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Nilanga
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 28-11-2025 | Appearance |
| 18-08-2025 | Appearance |
| 05-05-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 373/2025 Summary The court discharged accused Vishal Ramesh Jadhav under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, as the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons and police efforts failed to apprehend him. The court found it futile to keep the matter pending without the accused's presence or receipt of the Competent Authority report, making continued proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 373/2025 Summary The court discharged accused Vishal Ramesh Jadhav under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, as the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons and police efforts failed to apprehend him. The court found it futile to keep the matter pending without the accused's presence or receipt of the Competent Authority report, making continued proceedings purposeless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts