State of Maharashtra vs Mahadev Rohidas Nitnawre — 364/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--FINAL DECREE PREPARED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120011382025

Filing Number

652/2025

Filing Date

19-Apr-2025

Registration No

364/2025

Registration Date

19-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--FINAL DECREE PREPARED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

68

Police Station

Nilanga

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahadev Rohidas Nitnawre

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 364/2025 The court discharged accused Mahadev Rohidas Nitnawre from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the BNSS. The magistrate found that repeated summons failed to locate the accused, no Chargesheet was filed, and the prosecution exhibited contributory negligence, making further delay futile. Bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  5. 20-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  6. 05-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  7. 03-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 364/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 364/2025 The court discharged accused Mahadev Rohidas Nitnawre from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the BNSS. The magistrate found that repeated summons failed to locate the accused, no Chargesheet was filed, and the prosecution exhibited contributory negligence, making further delay futile. Bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case