State of Maharashtra vs Kalidas Gulab Kawale — 325/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120009802025
Filing Number
570/2025
Filing Date
28-Mar-2025
Registration No
325/2025
Registration Date
28-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
89
Police Station
Excise Department, Latur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kalidas Gulab Kawale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 325/2025 Summary The court discharged accused Kalidas Gulab Kawale from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023. The discharge was granted because despite multiple summons, the accused could not be traced, the Chargesheet Affidavit (CA) report was not received, and further delay would serve no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized articles were ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
13-Feb-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
14-Oct-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
22-Jul-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
17-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 325/2025
Case 325/2025 Summary The court discharged accused Kalidas Gulab Kawale from charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023. The discharge was granted because despite multiple summons, the accused could not be traced, the Chargesheet Affidavit (CA) report was not received, and further delay would serve no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized articles were ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts