State of Maharashtra vs Sachin Manikrao Patil — 300/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120009412025

Filing Number

544/2025

Filing Date

27-Mar-2025

Registration No

300/2025

Registration Date

27-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

Aurad Shahajani

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sachin Manikrao Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 300/2025 Summary The court discharged accused Sachin Manikrao Patil under Section 281 of BNSS for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found prosecutorial negligence after multiple unsuccessful Non-Bailable Warrants failed to locate the accused, determining that continuing the case served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized material disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  7. 04-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  8. 11-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 300/2025 Summary The court discharged accused Sachin Manikrao Patil under Section 281 of BNSS for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found prosecutorial negligence after multiple unsuccessful Non-Bailable Warrants failed to locate the accused, determining that continuing the case served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized material disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case