State of Maharashtra vs Pratap Shrimant Gaund — 294/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120009352025

Filing Number

538/2025

Filing Date

26-Mar-2025

Registration No

294/2025

Registration Date

26-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

30

Police Station

Aurad Shahajani

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pratap Shrimant Gaund

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the case against accused Pratap Shrimant Gaund under Section 281 of the BNSS for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The dismissal was granted due to prosecutorial negligence—multiple summons failed to locate the accused, no Chargesheet was filed, and continuing the case served no purpose. The accused was discharged, bail bonds cancelled, and seized material disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  7. 01-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  8. 09-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 26-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 294/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the case against accused Pratap Shrimant Gaund under Section 281 of the BNSS for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The dismissal was granted due to prosecutorial negligence—multiple summons failed to locate the accused, no Chargesheet was filed, and continuing the case served no purpose. The accused was discharged, bail bonds cancelled, and seized material disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case