State of Maharashtra vs Suraj Balaji Kamble — 261/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120008492025

Filing Number

492/2025

Filing Date

19-Mar-2025

Registration No

261/2025

Registration Date

19-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

Shirur Anantpal

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suraj Balaji Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Suraj Balaji Kamble from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that repeated summons failed to trace the accused, the CA report remained pending, and further delay served no purpose. Bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 29-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 16-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 05-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 261/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Suraj Balaji Kamble from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that repeated summons failed to trace the accused, the CA report remained pending, and further delay served no purpose. Bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband disposed of per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case