State of Maharashtra vs Bhimaro Devrao Kale — 251/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120008222025
Filing Number
478/2025
Filing Date
18-Mar-2025
Registration No
251/2025
Registration Date
18-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
7
Police Station
Shirur Anantpal
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bhimaro Devrao Kale
-
2.Santosh Shesherao Gangane
Adv. null
-
3.Karan Sangram Hande
Adv. null
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged the accused Bhimaro Devrao Kale, Santosh Shesherao Gangane, and Karan Sangram Hande under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023 in a prohibition case filed under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was ordered because the accused remained untraceable despite multiple summons, no purpose would be served by keeping the case pending, and the Forensic Chemistry Analysis (CA) report was not received. The court cancelled their bail bonds and ordered disposal of the seized material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
03-Jan-2026
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
30-Sep-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
23-Jul-2025
Appearance
2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga
-
04-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 251/2025
The court discharged the accused Bhimaro Devrao Kale, Santosh Shesherao Gangane, and Karan Sangram Hande under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023 in a prohibition case filed under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was ordered because the accused remained untraceable despite multiple summons, no purpose would be served by keeping the case pending, and the Forensic Chemistry Analysis (CA) report was not received. The court cancelled their bail bonds and ordered disposal of the seized material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts