State of Maharashtra vs Bhimaro Devrao Kale — 251/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120008222025

Case disposed

Filing Number

478/2025

Filing Date

18-03-2025

Registration No

251/2025

Registration Date

18-03-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

7

Police Station

Shirur Anantpal

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(a)(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Bhimaro Devrao Kale

Santosh Shesherao Gangane

Adv. null

Karan Sangram Hande

Adv. null

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Nilanga

13-03-2026

Disposed

03-01-2026

Appearance

30-09-2025

Appearance

23-07-2025

Appearance

04-04-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court discharged the accused Bhimaro Devrao Kale, Santosh Shesherao Gangane, and Karan Sangram Hande under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023 in a prohibition case filed under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was ordered because the accused remained untraceable despite multiple summons, no purpose would be served by keeping the case pending, and the Forensic Chemistry Analysis (CA) report was not received. The court cancelled their bail bonds and ordered disposal of the seized material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused Bhimaro Devrao Kale, Santosh Shesherao Gangane, and Karan Sangram Hande under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023 in a prohibition case filed under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The discharge was ordered because the accused remained untraceable despite multiple summons, no purpose would be served by keeping the case pending, and the Forensic Chemistry Analysis (CA) report was not received. The court cancelled their bail bonds and ordered disposal of the seized material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case