State of Maharashtra vs Narsing Vitthal Torasale — 2972/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 68,84. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120007322024

Filing Number

730/2024

Filing Date

11-Mar-2024

Registration No

2972/2024

Registration Date

11-Mar-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

326

Police Station

Excise Department, Udgir

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 68,84

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Narsing Vitthal Torasale

  2. 2.Vitthal Maruti Nilangekar

  3. 3.Sandip Ramrao Bagdure

  4. 4.Bhagwan Shivaji Jadhav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The court discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Bombay Prohibition Act case, finding that repeated summons failed to locate them and the investigation remained incomplete without a Competent Authority report. The court determined that further delay was unproductive and disposed of seized materials as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 27-May-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 11-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  9. 04-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  10. 25-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  11. 21-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 11-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2972/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a Bombay Prohibition Act case, finding that repeated summons failed to locate them and the investigation remained incomplete without a Competent Authority report. The court determined that further delay was unproductive and disposed of seized materials as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case