State of Maharashtra vs Shivkantabai Ambadas Vhanale — 203/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(f). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120006792025

Filing Number

406/2025

Filing Date

10-Mar-2025

Registration No

203/2025

Registration Date

10-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

204

Police Station

Kasar sirsi

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(f)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shivkantabai Ambadas Vhanale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: SCC No. 203/2025 The court discharged accused Shivkantabai Ambados Vhanale from charges under Section 65(f) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The discharge was ordered because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the police failed to apprehend her, the CA report remained pending, and further delay served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 26-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 22-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 09-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 24-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 203/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC No. 203/2025 The court discharged accused Shivkantabai Ambados Vhanale from charges under Section 65(f) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The discharge was ordered because the accused could not be traced despite multiple summons, the police failed to apprehend her, the CA report remained pending, and further delay served no purpose. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials were disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case