State of Maharashtra vs Shrimant Ismail Tenlag — 150/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120005472025

Filing Number

334/2025

Filing Date

25-Feb-2025

Registration No

150/2025

Registration Date

25-Feb-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

347

Police Station

Aurad Shahajani

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shrimant Ismail Tenlag

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shrimant Ismail Tenlag (150/2025) The JMFC Nilanga discharged the accused under Section 281 of the BNSS in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, finding that repeated summons failed to locate the accused and the prosecution exhibited contributory negligence with no Chargesheet filed. The court found no purpose in keeping the matter pending and ordered cancellation of bail bonds and disposal of seized articles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  6. 27-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  7. 20-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  8. 11-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 150/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shrimant Ismail Tenlag (150/2025) The JMFC Nilanga discharged the accused under Section 281 of the BNSS in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, finding that repeated summons failed to locate the accused and the prosecution exhibited contributory negligence with no Chargesheet filed. The court found no purpose in keeping the matter pending and ordered cancellation of bail bonds and disposal of seized articles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case