State of Maharashtra vs Shrimant Ismail Tenlag — 149/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120005462025

Filing Number

333/2025

Filing Date

24-Feb-2025

Registration No

149/2025

Registration Date

24-Feb-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

317

Police Station

Aurad Shahajani

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shrimant Ismail Tenlag

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Shrimant Ismail Tenlag in a liquor prohibition case (Section 65(e), Bombay Prohibition Act) under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, because despite multiple summons, the accused could not be traced and no CA report was received, making further pendency futile. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 23-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 19-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 19-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 11-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 149/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Shrimant Ismail Tenlag in a liquor prohibition case (Section 65(e), Bombay Prohibition Act) under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, because despite multiple summons, the accused could not be traced and no CA report was received, making further pendency futile. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized contraband disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case