State of Maharashtra vs Ankush Shankar Waghmare — 101/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120004182025

Filing Number

260/2025

Filing Date

13-Feb-2025

Registration No

101/2025

Registration Date

13-Feb-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

182

Police Station

Shirur Anantpal

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ankush Shankar Waghmare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Ankush Shankar Waghmare under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a liquor prohibition case because the prosecution repeatedly failed to secure his presence despite multiple summons and police efforts. The court found no purpose in keeping the case pending indefinitely and ordered cancellation of bail bonds and disposal of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 12-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 26-May-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  8. 27-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Ankush Shankar Waghmare under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a liquor prohibition case because the prosecution repeatedly failed to secure his presence despite multiple summons and police efforts. The court found no purpose in keeping the case pending indefinitely and ordered cancellation of bail bonds and disposal of seized materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case