State of Maharashtra vs Roshansing Bablusing Tak — 47/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(a),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120003592026

Filing Number

186/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

47/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

Kasar sirsi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(a),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Roshansing Bablusing Tak

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Roshansing Bablusing Tak (RCC 47/2026) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Roshansing Bablusing Tak of charges under Sections 331(4), 305(a), and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (house-breaking theft). While the court accepted that a theft by house-breaking occurred at Vishvakarma Jewellers on 23-24 March 2025, it found the prosecution failed to prove the accused's involvement due to procedural lapses in property seizure, lack of proper discovery memorandum, and inability to establish that stolen articles (108 silver anklets) were recovered from the accused in timely manner—critical evidentiary gaps defeating conviction beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  8. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  9. 01-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  10. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  11. 30-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  12. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  13. 24-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  14. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  15. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  16. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  17. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  18. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  19. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  20. 26-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  21. 26-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  22. 26-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  23. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  24. 23-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  25. 23-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  26. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  27. 16-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  28. 16-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  29. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  30. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

  31. 06-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 47/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Roshansing Bablusing Tak (RCC 47/2026) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Roshansing Bablusing Tak of charges under Sections 331(4), 305(a), and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (house-breaking theft). While the court accepted that a theft by house-breaking occurred at Vishvakarma Jewellers on 23-24 March 2025, it found the prosecution failed to prove the accused's involvement due to procedural lapses in property seizure, lack of proper discovery memorandum, and inability to establish that stolen articles (108 silver anklets) were recovered from the accused in timely manner—critical evidentiary gaps defeating conviction beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case