State of Maharashtra vs Roshansing Bablusing Tak — 47/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(a),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120003592026

Case disposed

Filing Number

186/2026

Filing Date

04-02-2026

Registration No

47/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

Decision Date

09th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

Kasar sirsi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4),305(a),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Roshansing Bablusing Tak

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga

09-04-2026

Disposed

08-04-2026

Judgment

07-04-2026

Judgment

06-04-2026

Judgment

04-04-2026

Judgment

Final Orders / Judgements

09-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Roshansing Bablusing Tak (RCC 47/2026) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Roshansing Bablusing Tak of charges under Sections 331(4), 305(a), and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (house-breaking theft). While the court accepted that a theft by house-breaking occurred at Vishvakarma Jewellers on 23-24 March 2025, it found the prosecution failed to prove the accused's involvement due to procedural lapses in property seizure, lack of proper discovery memorandum, and inability to establish that stolen articles (108 silver anklets) were recovered from the accused in timely manner—critical evidentiary gaps defeating conviction beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

16-02-2026
Evidence
23-02-2026
Evidence
23-02-2026
Evidence
16-02-2026
Evidence
26-02-2026
Evidence
26-02-2026
Evidence
26-02-2026
Evidence
24-03-2026
Evidence
30-03-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Roshansing Bablusing Tak (RCC 47/2026) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Roshansing Bablusing Tak of charges under Sections 331(4), 305(a), and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (house-breaking theft). While the court accepted that a theft by house-breaking occurred at Vishvakarma Jewellers on 23-24 March 2025, it found the prosecution failed to prove the accused's involvement due to procedural lapses in property seizure, lack of proper discovery memorandum, and inability to establish that stolen articles (108 silver anklets) were recovered from the accused in timely manner—critical evidentiary gaps defeating conviction beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case