State of Maharashtra vs Usman Rubab Fakir — 82/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA120003492025

Filing Number

234/2025

Filing Date

07-Feb-2025

Registration No

82/2025

Registration Date

07-Feb-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

77

Police Station

Excise Department, Latur

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Usman Rubab Fakir

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings against accused Usman Rubab Fakir under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and discharged him from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing the accused's inability to be traced despite multiple summons, failure of police machinery, non-receipt of CA report, and lack of purpose in keeping the case pending. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  5. 23-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  6. 28-May-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Nilanga

  7. 21-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 82/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against accused Usman Rubab Fakir under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and discharged him from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing the accused's inability to be traced despite multiple summons, failure of police machinery, non-receipt of CA report, and lack of purpose in keeping the case pending. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials ordered disposed of as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case