State of Maharashtra vs Madhav Rohidas Nitanware — 60/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA120002742025
Filing Number
202/2025
Filing Date
03-02-2025
Registration No
60/2025
Registration Date
03-02-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Nilanga
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
43
Police Station
Excise Department, Latur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Madhav Rohidas Nitanware
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. CJJD JMFC Nilanga
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-01-2026 | Appearance |
| 25-09-2025 | Appearance |
| 17-06-2025 | Appearance |
| 17-02-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 60/2025 The court discharged accused Madhav Rohidas Nitanware in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023. The discharge was warranted because multiple summons failed to locate the accused, the Constable's report remained unreceived, and continuing the case served no purpose. The bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 60/2025 The court discharged accused Madhav Rohidas Nitanware in a Bombay Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surakhsa Sanhita, 2023. The discharge was warranted because multiple summons failed to locate the accused, the Constable's report remained unreceived, and continuing the case served no purpose. The bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts