Shantabai Harishchnadra Tapdiya vs Nil — 51/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th April 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA120001332026
e-Filing Number
05-01-2026
Filing Number
66/2026
Filing Date
16-Jan-2026
Registration No
51/2026
Registration Date
19-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shantabai Harishchnadra Tapdiya
Adv. JADHAV DATTATRAY MADHAVRAO
-
2.Puranmal Ramanujdas Biyani
Adv. JADHAV DATTATRAY MADHAVRAO
-
3.Gayatri Subhash Bangad
Adv. JADHAV DATTATRAY MADHAVRAO
-
4.Jugal Ramanujdas Biyani
Adv. JADHAV DATTATRAY MADHAVRAO
-
5.Asha Sunil Zanvar
Adv. JADHAV DATTATRAY MADHAVRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted the petition filed by Shantabai, Puranmal, and Gayatri seeking a succession certificate as legal heirs of the deceased Ramanujas Sarji (died 14.08.1988). The court found that the petitioners are the legitimate heirs, no prior succession certificate applications exist, public notice requirements were satisfied, and no objections were filed. The court directed the issuance of the succession certificate upon payment of applicable court fees per Mumbai Regulation 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga
-
20-Mar-2026
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga
-
19-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 51/2026
The court granted the petition filed by Shantabai, Puranmal, and Gayatri seeking a succession certificate as legal heirs of the deceased Ramanujas Sarji (died 14.08.1988). The court found that the petitioners are the legitimate heirs, no prior succession certificate applications exist, public notice requirements were satisfied, and no objections were filed. The court directed the issuance of the succession certificate upon payment of applicable court fees per Mumbai Regulation 2. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts