Reshma Aijaz Mulla vs Nil — 27/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 04th May 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA120000562026
e-Filing Number
15-12-2025
Filing Number
31/2026
Filing Date
05-01-2026
Registration No
27/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Nilanga
Judge
1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Reshma Aijaz Mulla
Adv. Shaikh Mazharuddin Raufsab
Savita Malhari Kalyani
Adv. Shaikh Mazharuddin Raufsab
Priti Balaprasad Mantri
Adv. Shaikh Mazharuddin Raufsab
Respondent(s)
Nil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Nilanga
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Public Notice/Proclamation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary - 27/2026 The court granted the petition filed by Reshma Aijaz Mulla, Savita Malhari Kalyani, and Priti Balaprasad Mantri seeking a succession certificate as legal heirs of the deceased Malhari Narayana Kalyani (died 26.08.2025). The court found that the petitioners are legitimate heirs, no prior succession certificate application existed, proper public notice was issued with no objections received, and the petitioners require the certificate for accessing government/non-government benefits. The court ordered issuance of the succession certificate upon payment of applicable court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - 27/2026 The court granted the petition filed by Reshma Aijaz Mulla, Savita Malhari Kalyani, and Priti Balaprasad Mantri seeking a succession certificate as legal heirs of the deceased Malhari Narayana Kalyani (died 26.08.2025). The court found that the petitioners are legitimate heirs, no prior succession certificate application existed, proper public notice was issued with no objections received, and the petitioners require the certificate for accessing government/non-government benefits. The court ordered issuance of the succession certificate upon payment of applicable court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts