Gulchand @ Gulab Bhaurao Mule vs Collector, Latur — 1434/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Public Notice/Proclamation. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA110021452022
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
1684/2022
Filing Date
18-10-2022
Registration No
1434/2022
Registration Date
18-10-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gulchand @ Gulab Bhaurao Mule
Adv. Sabnis Satish A
Laxman Vishwanath Mule
Respondent(s)
Collector, Latur
Sub Divisional Officer at Nilanga
Tahsildar
Shivaji Vaijinath Barmade
Angad Hanmant Barmade
Vilas Manik Barmade
Waman Govind Barmade
Devidas Taterao Barmade
Shesherao Kalba Mule
Taterao Prabhakar Mule
Nanarao Prabhakar Mule
Madhav Vitthal Thengil
Babu Vitthal Thengil
Dnyanoba Vitthal Thengil
Datta Vitthal Thengil
Suryabhan Vitthal Thengil(Legal Heir)
Venkat Bhimrao Thengil
Gundu Rama Irale
Balaji Sakharam Mugle
Baburao Baliram Kadam
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Public Notice/Proclamation
Public Notice/Proclamation
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
| 27-01-2026 | Public Notice/Proclamation |
| 12-12-2025 | Hearing |
| 10-11-2025 | Hearing |
| 07-10-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No.1434/2022 The court allowed the plaintiffs' temporary injunction application and suspended the Tahsildar's order dated 31/01/2022 until final suit disposal. The plaintiffs claimed ownership of agricultural land through which defendants sought to establish a customary footway; the court found a prima-facie case for plaintiffs, noting village maps and records showed no evidence of the alleged way through their property and the Tahsildar's order violated procedural requirements under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No.1434/2022 The court allowed the plaintiffs' temporary injunction application and suspended the Tahsildar's order dated 31/01/2022 until final suit disposal. The plaintiffs claimed ownership of agricultural land through which defendants sought to establish a customary footway; the court found a prima-facie case for plaintiffs, noting village maps and records showed no evidence of the alleged way through their property and the Tahsildar's order violated procedural requirements under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts