Annarao Shankarrao Mane vs Ramesh Shankarrao Mane Advocate - Patil Ram N — 728/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA110017992022
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
1059/2022
Filing Date
04-05-2022
Registration No
728/2022
Registration Date
04-05-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Annarao Shankarrao Mane
Adv. Jadhav Udhav S
Respondent(s)
Ramesh Shankarrao Mane Advocate - Patil Ram N
Madhukar Shankarrao Mane
Sharad Pralhad Jagtap
Hanmant Pralhad Jagtap
Pralhad Nivartti Jagtap
Sudarshan Murlidhar Limbapure
Surekha Madhukar Mane
Satish Suryabahan Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This document is a civil property dispute case involving testimony and land ownership claims. The case involves petitioner Annarao Shankarrao Mane disputing property rights with respondents regarding various land parcels acquired through purchases, family divisions, and transfers over several decades. The court heard cross-examination of the petitioner's witness and found significant inconsistencies in testimony regarding land ownership, documentation, and historical transactions. The court concluded the witness testimony was unreliable, with contradictions about property boundaries, acquisition dates, and family settlement claims. The petition was dismissed and cross-examination was not permitted (उलटतपास पूर्ण, फेरतपास नाही), with the judgment dated 13.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a civil property dispute case involving testimony and land ownership claims. The case involves petitioner Annarao Shankarrao Mane disputing property rights with respondents regarding various land parcels acquired through purchases, family divisions, and transfers over several decades. The court heard cross-examination of the petitioner's witness and found significant inconsistencies in testimony regarding land ownership, documentation, and historical transactions. The court concluded the witness testimony was unreliable, with contradictions about property boundaries, acquisition dates, and family settlement claims. The petition was dismissed and cross-examination was not permitted (उलटतपास पूर्ण, फेरतपास नाही), with the judgment dated 13.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts