Annarao Shankarrao Mane vs Ramesh Shankarrao Mane Advocate - Patil Ram N — 728/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA110017992022

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

1059/2022

Filing Date

04-05-2022

Registration No

728/2022

Registration Date

04-05-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7

Petitioner(s)

Annarao Shankarrao Mane

Adv. Jadhav Udhav S

Respondent(s)

Ramesh Shankarrao Mane Advocate - Patil Ram N

Madhukar Shankarrao Mane

Sharad Pralhad Jagtap

Hanmant Pralhad Jagtap

Pralhad Nivartti Jagtap

Sudarshan Murlidhar Limbapure

Surekha Madhukar Mane

Satish Suryabahan Pawar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

02-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

23-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

09-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

11-11-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

13-03-2026
Evidence

This document is a civil property dispute case involving testimony and land ownership claims. The case involves petitioner Annarao Shankarrao Mane disputing property rights with respondents regarding various land parcels acquired through purchases, family divisions, and transfers over several decades. The court heard cross-examination of the petitioner's witness and found significant inconsistencies in testimony regarding land ownership, documentation, and historical transactions. The court concluded the witness testimony was unreliable, with contradictions about property boundaries, acquisition dates, and family settlement claims. The petition was dismissed and cross-examination was not permitted (उलटतपास पूर्ण, फेरतपास नाही), with the judgment dated 13.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a civil property dispute case involving testimony and land ownership claims. The case involves petitioner Annarao Shankarrao Mane disputing property rights with respondents regarding various land parcels acquired through purchases, family divisions, and transfers over several decades. The court heard cross-examination of the petitioner's witness and found significant inconsistencies in testimony regarding land ownership, documentation, and historical transactions. The court concluded the witness testimony was unreliable, with contradictions about property boundaries, acquisition dates, and family settlement claims. The petition was dismissed and cross-examination was not permitted (उलटतपास पूर्ण, फेरतपास नाही), with the judgment dated 13.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case