Sayaji Ganpati More and other 1 vs Shivaji Ganpati More and other 6 Advocate - Paul Ajit H — 449/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA110013602022
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
1002/2020
Filing Date
25-11-2020
Registration No
449/2020
Registration Date
25-11-2020
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sayaji Ganpati More and other 1
Adv. Jadhav Udhav S
Sonabai Ganpati More
Adv. Jadhav Udhav S
Respondent(s)
Shivaji Ganpati More and other 6 Advocate - Paul Ajit H
Tanaji Ganpati More
Balaji Ganpati More
Mangalbai Baburao Biradar
Anusaya Shivaji More
Adv. Paul Ajit H
Navnath Shivaji More
Adv. Paul Ajit H
Dayamanta Shrimant Basude
Adv. Kumbhar Nagesh D
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Civil Revision Case 449/2020, petitioners Sayaji Ganpati More and Sonabai Ganpati More challenged a property dispute involving ancestral land (5 acres 10 guntas). The petitioners contested the legality of a sale deed executed in favor of respondent No. 07, arguing that proper partition/distribution of ancestral property had not occurred. During cross-examination of respondent No. 01, 05, and 06 (conducted on 15/09/2025), the court admitted further counter-examination and adjourned the case for continued proceedings before the District Court, Latur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Civil Revision Case 449/2020, petitioners Sayaji Ganpati More and Sonabai Ganpati More challenged a property dispute involving ancestral land (5 acres 10 guntas). The petitioners contested the legality of a sale deed executed in favor of respondent No. 07, arguing that proper partition/distribution of ancestral property had not occurred. During cross-examination of respondent No. 01, 05, and 06 (conducted on 15/09/2025), the court admitted further counter-examination and adjourned the case for continued proceedings before the District Court, Latur. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts