Sangram Apparao Malleshe vs Anteshwar Ramanna Malleshe Advocate - Narhare Praveen L — 852/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA110012422022
Filing Number
1215/2022
Filing Date
09-Jun-2022
Registration No
852/2022
Registration Date
09-Jun-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sangram Apparao Malleshe
Adv. Jadhav Udhav S
-
2.Gajendra Apparao Malleshe
-
3.Lubjabai Prabhakar Birajdar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anteshwar Ramanna Malleshe Advocate - Narhare Praveen L
-
2.Venkat Ramanna Malleshe
Adv. Narhare Praveen L
-
3.Mankarnabai Somnath Karvande
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
28-Oct-2025
EvidenceView PDF
Case Summary: 852/2022 Outcome: Cross-examination of witness completed; petition allowed in full. Petition dismissed with no relief granted. This civil case involved a property dispute regarding land ownership in various plot numbers (124, 125, 126). The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of a witness from the respondent's side regarding ancestral property claims and possession. The witness's testimony was found unreliable, with contradictions regarding property transfers and ownership details. The court ultimately decided the petition in favor of the petitioners (Sangram, Gajendra, and Lubjabai), dismissing the respondent's claims regarding the disputed agricultural land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
17-Mar-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
17-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
06-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
13-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
29-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
24-Oct-2024
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
10-Sep-2024
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
08-Jul-2024
List of Witness
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
02-May-2024
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
-
14-Mar-2024
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
-
08-Feb-2024
Issues
-
13-Dec-2023
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
-
13-Oct-2023
Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
-
01-Sep-2023
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
10-Aug-2023
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
01-Jul-2023
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
13-Jun-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
13-Jun-2023
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
06-Apr-2023
Written Statement
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
15-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
10-Jan-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
22-Nov-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
15-Oct-2022
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
-
05-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 852/2022
Case Summary: 852/2022 Outcome: Cross-examination of witness completed; petition allowed in full. Petition dismissed with no relief granted. This civil case involved a property dispute regarding land ownership in various plot numbers (124, 125, 126). The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of a witness from the respondent's side regarding ancestral property claims and possession. The witness's testimony was found unreliable, with contradictions regarding property transfers and ownership details. The court ultimately decided the petition in favor of the petitioners (Sangram, Gajendra, and Lubjabai), dismissing the respondent's claims regarding the disputed agricultural land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts