Sangram Apparao Malleshe vs Anteshwar Ramanna Malleshe Advocate - Narhare Praveen L — 852/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA110012422022
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
1215/2022
Filing Date
09-06-2022
Registration No
852/2022
Registration Date
09-06-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sangram Apparao Malleshe
Adv. Jadhav Udhav S
Gajendra Apparao Malleshe
Lubjabai Prabhakar Birajdar
Respondent(s)
Anteshwar Ramanna Malleshe Advocate - Narhare Praveen L
Venkat Ramanna Malleshe
Adv. Narhare Praveen L
Mankarnabai Somnath Karvande
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 28-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 28-10-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 852/2022 Outcome: Cross-examination of witness completed; petition allowed in full. Petition dismissed with no relief granted. This civil case involved a property dispute regarding land ownership in various plot numbers (124, 125, 126). The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of a witness from the respondent's side regarding ancestral property claims and possession. The witness's testimony was found unreliable, with contradictions regarding property transfers and ownership details. The court ultimately decided the petition in favor of the petitioners (Sangram, Gajendra, and Lubjabai), dismissing the respondent's claims regarding the disputed agricultural land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 852/2022 Outcome: Cross-examination of witness completed; petition allowed in full. Petition dismissed with no relief granted. This civil case involved a property dispute regarding land ownership in various plot numbers (124, 125, 126). The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of a witness from the respondent's side regarding ancestral property claims and possession. The witness's testimony was found unreliable, with contradictions regarding property transfers and ownership details. The court ultimately decided the petition in favor of the petitioners (Sangram, Gajendra, and Lubjabai), dismissing the respondent's claims regarding the disputed agricultural land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts