Sumitra Rajeshwari Swami vs Subhash Sidhaiyya Mathpati and oths.8 Advocate - Ghadke Kiran S — 393/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA110009222022

Filing Number

649/2017

Filing Date

14-Sep-2017

Registration No

393/2017

Registration Date

14-Sep-2017

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sumitra Rajeshwari Swami

    Adv. Narhare Praveen L

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subhash Sidhaiyya Mathpati and oths.8 Advocate - Ghadke Kiran S

  2. 2.Sidhaiyya Subhash Mathpati

  3. 3.Shivkumar Subhash Mathpati

  4. 4.Nirmala Subhash Mathpati

    Adv. Ghadke Kiran S

  5. 5.Koushalya Umesh Davargave

    Adv. Ghadke Kiran S

  6. 6.Savita Mallikarjun Swami

    Adv. Ghadke Kiran S

  7. 7.Kavita Subhash Mathpati

    Adv. Ghadke Kiran S

  8. 8.Shahanavaj Sattar Mulla

    Adv. Shaikh Majidali A

  9. 9.Narsing Dattu Biradar

    Adv. More Sandip K

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  10. 01-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  11. 14-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  12. 29-Oct-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 393/2017 - Sumitra vs. Subhash & Ors. Outcome: The court set aside the order dated 12.09.2025 that had discarded the plaintiff's evidence. The plaintiff's application for reinstatement was allowed in the interest of justice, as the suit concerns partition of ancestral joint family property. The plaintiff's absence was due to continuous rains blocking roads and her illness. However, the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1,000 to defendants 8 and 9 as compensation for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 29-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  14. 10-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  15. 29-Sep-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  16. 12-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  17. 12-Sep-2025

    Dismissal Order

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  18. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  19. 07-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  20. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  21. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  22. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  23. 09-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  24. 18-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  25. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  26. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  27. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  28. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  29. 12-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  30. 12-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  31. 08-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  32. 21-Sep-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  33. 19-Aug-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  34. 24-Jul-2024

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  35. 06-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  36. 15-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  37. 08-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  38. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  39. 04-Mar-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  40. 04-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  41. 07-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  42. 16-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  43. 19-Dec-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  44. 06-Nov-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  45. 30-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  46. 11-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  47. 21-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  48. 13-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  49. 17-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  50. 09-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  51. 21-Dec-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  52. 21-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  53. 10-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  54. 26-Sep-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  55. 14-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 14-Sep-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 393/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 393/2017 - Sumitra vs. Subhash & Ors. Outcome: The court set aside the order dated 12.09.2025 that had discarded the plaintiff's evidence. The plaintiff's application for reinstatement was allowed in the interest of justice, as the suit concerns partition of ancestral joint family property. The plaintiff's absence was due to continuous rains blocking roads and her illness. However, the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of Rs. 1,000 to defendants 8 and 9 as compensation for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case