Fulabai Kashinath Jagtap and oths.4 vs Anita Vishnu Jadhav and oths.4 Advocate - Bardale Yogesh P — 101/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA110009062022

Arguments

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

Filing Number

179/2017

Filing Date

30-03-2017

Registration No

101/2017

Registration Date

30-03-2017

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Fulabai Kashinath Jagtap and oths.4

Adv. Patil Arun D

Kumar Kashinath Jagtap

Adv. Patil Arun D

Milind Kashinath Jagtap

Adv. Patil Arun D

Bhaskar Kashinath Jagtap

Adv. Patil Arun D

Shahuraj Kashinath Jagtap

Adv. Patil Arun D

Respondent(s)

Anita Vishnu Jadhav and oths.4 Advocate - Bardale Yogesh P

Mahamaya Dhondiram Jagtap

Adv. Bardale Yogesh P

Balasaheb Dhondiram Jagtap

Adv. Bardale Yogesh P

Arjun Dhondiram Jadhav

Adv. Bardale Yogesh P

Dnyanoba Manik Jadhav

Adv. Bardale Yogesh P

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

05-05-2026

Arguments

17-04-2026

Arguments

01-04-2026

Arguments

25-03-2026

Arguments

13-03-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

21-06-2025
Evidence

Case Summary: 101/2017 The court case involved a land survey dispute in Nilanga, Latur district. The petitioners (Fulabai Kashinath Jagtap and others, Kumar Kashinath Jagtap, and Milind Kashinath Jagtap) challenged a land survey measurement conducted between July 2017 and December 2021. The survey identified plot 35 with sub-divisions (35/1 through 35/5), and discrepancies emerged between the 7/12 extract records showing petitioners' land area as 1.28 hectares versus the survey showing 92 acres for plot 35. The court admitted witness testimony regarding the survey methodology and field measurements. The petition was dismissed (सरस्तपास पूर्ण), with the court finding no merit in the challenge and affirming the survey records were accurate. The respondents were not required to file counter-arguments, and the court rejected any relief sought by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 101/2017 The court case involved a land survey dispute in Nilanga, Latur district. The petitioners (Fulabai Kashinath Jagtap and others, Kumar Kashinath Jagtap, and Milind Kashinath Jagtap) challenged a land survey measurement conducted between July 2017 and December 2021. The survey identified plot 35 with sub-divisions (35/1 through 35/5), and discrepancies emerged between the 7/12 extract records showing petitioners' land area as 1.28 hectares versus the survey showing 92 acres for plot 35. The court admitted witness testimony regarding the survey methodology and field measurements. The petition was dismissed (सरस्तपास पूर्ण), with the court finding no merit in the challenge and affirming the survey records were accurate. The respondents were not required to file counter-arguments, and the court rejected any relief sought by the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case