Keshav Madhavrao Shinde vs Prabhavati Shrimantrao shinde and Ors. — 409/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA110005322019
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
550/2019
Filing Date
03-09-2019
Registration No
409/2019
Registration Date
03-09-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Keshav Madhavrao Shinde
Adv. Jawalegkar Prasad G
Respondent(s)
Prabhavati Shrimantrao shinde and Ors.
Jayshri Shrimantrao Shinde
Rajeshri Shrimantrao Shinde
Shahu Shrimantrao Shinde
Surekha Shrimantrao Shinde
Asha Shrimant Shinde
Chandrakala Shrimantrao Shinde
Anusaya Shrimantrao Shinde
Jaykrushna Shrimantrao Shinde
Adv. Narhare Praveen L
Navnath Shrimantrao Shinde
Adv. Narhare Praveen L
Veershetti Baliram Biradar
The Land Acquisition Officer or Sub Divisional Officer at Nilanga
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 14-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In RCS 409/2019 (Keshav v. Prabhavati and Ors.), the Civil Judge ordered that the suit proceed without cross-examination of witness Kachru Narsing Deshmane (PW 2) by the defendants. The defendants were repeatedly absent despite sufficient opportunities and failed to file an adjournment application, resulting in the court allowing the case to proceed on a priority basis without their cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In RCS 409/2019 (Keshav v. Prabhavati and Ors.), the Civil Judge ordered that the suit proceed without cross-examination of witness Kachru Narsing Deshmane (PW 2) by the defendants. The defendants were repeatedly absent despite sufficient opportunities and failed to file an adjournment application, resulting in the court allowing the case to proceed on a priority basis without their cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts