Vitthal Rangrao More vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - Patel Syed Mujahe Dulla M — 1037/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 10-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA110005192022

Filing Number

592/2022

Filing Date

15-Jul-2022

Registration No

1037/2022

Registration Date

15-Jul-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vitthal Rangrao More

    Adv. Jadhav Udhav S

  2. 2.Navalbai Vitthalrao More

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Advocate - Patel Syed Mujahe Dulla M

  2. 2.Tahsildar

  3. 3.Madhav Ganpati More

  4. 4.Pandurang Dhondiba More

  5. 5.Tatyarao Rangrao More

  6. 6.Govind Rangrao More

  7. 7.Ram Rangrao More

  8. 8.Datta Tukaram More

  9. 9.Dnyaneshwar Tukaram More

  10. 10.Digambar Tukaram More

  11. 11.Ranjit Ramrao More

  12. 12.Digambar Ramrao More

  13. 13.Sanjay Tatyarao More

Case History

  1. 10-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  6. 15-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  7. 08-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  8. 15-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  9. 12-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  10. 06-May-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: RCS 1037/2022 - Vitthal Rangrao More v. State of Maharashtra Outcome: The application for temporary injunction was allowed. The court restrained defendants from obstructing the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of their land at village Sawari, Latur district, and from creating a new way through the northern side (Gat No.7) of the plaintiffs' property. Key Finding: The court found that plaintiffs established a prima-facie case, the balance of convenience favored them, and they would suffer irreparable loss without protection. The court noted that defendants had alternative access routes available and that no official record supported a way through the plaintiffs' land—only a water stream passage existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 06-May-2025

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  12. 09-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  13. 08-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  14. 07-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  15. 03-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  16. 28-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  17. 03-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  18. 25-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  19. 20-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  20. 12-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  21. 05-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  22. 31-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  23. 20-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  24. 29-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  25. 22-Oct-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  26. 22-Oct-2024

    Compliance

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  27. 19-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  28. 23-Aug-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  29. 23-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  30. 07-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  31. 23-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  32. 18-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  33. 11-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  34. 05-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  35. 20-Feb-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  36. 18-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  37. 18-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  38. 23-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  39. 10-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  40. 29-Aug-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  41. 28-Jun-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  42. 28-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  43. 11-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  44. 29-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  45. 08-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  46. 31-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  47. 13-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  48. 07-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  49. 25-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  50. 16-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  51. 05-Nov-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  52. 17-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  53. 10-Oct-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  54. 10-Oct-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  55. 03-Oct-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  56. 03-Oct-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  57. 12-Sep-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  58. 02-Sep-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  59. 01-Aug-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  60. 01-Aug-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  61. 26-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  62. 22-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  63. 21-Jul-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  64. 21-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  65. 18-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  66. 15-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 15-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1037/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 1037/2022 - Vitthal Rangrao More v. State of Maharashtra Outcome: The application for temporary injunction was allowed. The court restrained defendants from obstructing the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of their land at village Sawari, Latur district, and from creating a new way through the northern side (Gat No.7) of the plaintiffs' property. Key Finding: The court found that plaintiffs established a prima-facie case, the balance of convenience favored them, and they would suffer irreparable loss without protection. The court noted that defendants had alternative access routes available and that no official record supported a way through the plaintiffs' land—only a water stream passage existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case