Ramanand Ganpat Hogade vs Mahananda Dattatrya Hogade Advocate - Matole Shankar M — 850/2022

Summary of Case 850/2022 This is a property dispute case involving family members contesting ownership and partition of inherited properties. The petitioner, Ramanand Ganpat Hogade, challenged the respondents' claims regarding property division. After cross-examination of witnesses from both sides (respondents 1-3 represented by S.A. Matole and respondents 4-7 represented by T.B. Shinde), the court heard arguments on contested issues including previous partition proceedings (Civil Suit 130/97), individual property ownership claims, and rightful shares in ancestral properties. Outcome: The petition was allowed in full; appeal partly allowed. The court found merit in the petitioner's contentions and dismissed the respondents' false claims regarding independent property ownership, ruling that properties must be partitioned according to rightful shares established in the earlier proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.