Ramanand Ganpat Hogade vs Mahananda Dattatrya Hogade Advocate - Matole Shankar M — 850/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 20-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA110004092022

Filing Number

482/2022

Filing Date

09-Jun-2022

Registration No

850/2022

Registration Date

09-Jun-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramanand Ganpat Hogade

    Adv. Jadhav Udhav S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahananda Dattatrya Hogade Advocate - Matole Shankar M

  2. 2.Aswini Dattatrya Hogade

  3. 3.Usha Dattatrya Hogade

  4. 4.Laxmibai Brahmanand Hogade

  5. 5.Balu Brahmanand Hogade

  6. 6.Vasant Brahmanand Hogade

  7. 7.Basvaraj Brahmanand Hogade

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Summary of Case 850/2022 This is a property dispute case involving family members contesting ownership and partition of inherited properties. The petitioner, Ramanand Ganpat Hogade, challenged the respondents' claims regarding property division. After cross-examination of witnesses from both sides (respondents 1-3 represented by S.A. Matole and respondents 4-7 represented by T.B. Shinde), the court heard arguments on contested issues including previous partition proceedings (Civil Suit 130/97), individual property ownership claims, and rightful shares in ancestral properties. Outcome: The petition was allowed in full; appeal partly allowed. The court found merit in the petitioner's contentions and dismissed the respondents' false claims regarding independent property ownership, ruling that properties must be partitioned according to rightful shares established in the earlier proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  8. 01-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  9. 06-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  10. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  11. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  12. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  13. 26-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  14. 16-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  15. 04-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  16. 22-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  17. 25-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 25-Nov-2024

    List of Witness

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  19. 23-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  20. 13-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  21. 05-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  22. 06-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  23. 28-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  24. 20-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  25. 18-Mar-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  26. 29-Jan-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  27. 19-Dec-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  28. 04-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  29. 29-Sep-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  30. 10-Aug-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  31. 13-Jun-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  32. 28-Apr-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  33. 27-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  34. 13-Mar-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  35. 27-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  36. 03-Feb-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  37. 17-Jan-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  38. 17-Dec-2022

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  39. 21-Nov-2022

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  40. 21-Nov-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  41. 18-Oct-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  42. 07-Sep-2022

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division

  43. 03-Aug-2022

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  44. 29-Jun-2022

    Steps_Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  45. 09-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 09-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 850/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 850/2022 This is a property dispute case involving family members contesting ownership and partition of inherited properties. The petitioner, Ramanand Ganpat Hogade, challenged the respondents' claims regarding property division. After cross-examination of witnesses from both sides (respondents 1-3 represented by S.A. Matole and respondents 4-7 represented by T.B. Shinde), the court heard arguments on contested issues including previous partition proceedings (Civil Suit 130/97), individual property ownership claims, and rightful shares in ancestral properties. Outcome: The petition was allowed in full; appeal partly allowed. The court found merit in the petitioner's contentions and dismissed the respondents' false claims regarding independent property ownership, ruling that properties must be partitioned according to rightful shares established in the earlier proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case