Kalawatibai do Manikreddi Bhingole vs Karimsab So Ismailsab Bagwan and oths. 10 Advocate - Shinde Vikramsingh S — 1000010/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
Reg Dkst - Regular Execution Petition
CNR: MHLA110002492015
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
1000238/2015
Filing Date
10-04-2015
Registration No
1000010/2015
Registration Date
10-04-2015
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kalawatibai do Manikreddi Bhingole
Adv. Gaikwad Hemant V
Respondent(s)
Karimsab So Ismailsab Bagwan and oths. 10 Advocate - Shinde Vikramsingh S
Nizamsab So Talabsab Bagwan his Lrs Lalbee Wo Nizamsab Bagwan
Najirsab Nizamsab Bagwan
Yunud So Nizamsab Bagwan
Rabbani So Nizamsab Bagwan
Ayub So Nizamsab Bagwan
Wajid So Nizamsab Bagwan
Taiyab So Nizamsab Bagwan
Saminurbee Wo Basunsab Bagwan
Shahajadbee Wo Ajamoddin Bagwan
Risalatbee Wo Khudboddin Bagwan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 07-04-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 13-03-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 13-02-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 02-01-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Kalawatibai v. Karimsab (Case 1000010/2015), the Civil Judge at Nilanga dismissed the application against Saminabee Karimsab Bagwan on 07/04/2025. The dismissal was ordered under Order IX Rule 5 CPC because the defendant and advocate failed to appear when called at 3.25 pm and did not take steps to secure the presence of the legal heir of the deceased, nor did they seek adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Kalawatibai v. Karimsab (Case 1000010/2015), the Civil Judge at Nilanga dismissed the application against Saminabee Karimsab Bagwan on 07/04/2025. The dismissal was ordered under Order IX Rule 5 CPC because the defendant and advocate failed to appear when called at 3.25 pm and did not take steps to secure the presence of the legal heir of the deceased, nor did they seek adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts