Mohan Daulatrao Bhadarge vs Vasant Baliram Bhadarge And Others 11 Advocate - Dhumal Ravikiran N — 1000087/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA110001982014
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
1000087/2014
Filing Date
01-03-2014
Registration No
1000087/2014
Registration Date
01-03-2014
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohan Daulatrao Bhadarge
Adv. Jadhav Udhav S
Respondent(s)
Vasant Baliram Bhadarge And Others 11 Advocate - Dhumal Ravikiran N
Baliram Suryabhan Bhadarge
Kashibai Pandurang Bhadarge(Legal Heir)
Nagarabai Bhaurao Bhadarge(Legal Heir)
Bhaurao Bapurao Bhadarge
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 25-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Mohan Daulatrao Bhadarge v. Vasant Baliram Bhadarge (RCS No. 87/2014) Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application and set aside the order dated 11.11.2025 that had closed the plaintiff's evidence. The plaintiff, who claimed illness prevented him from leading his evidence, was granted the opportunity to continue proceedings subject to payment of Rs. 500 as cost to the defendants. The court prioritized deciding the real controversies on merits while acknowledging the plaintiff's delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Mohan Daulatrao Bhadarge v. Vasant Baliram Bhadarge (RCS No. 87/2014) Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application and set aside the order dated 11.11.2025 that had closed the plaintiff's evidence. The plaintiff, who claimed illness prevented him from leading his evidence, was granted the opportunity to continue proceedings subject to payment of Rs. 500 as cost to the defendants. The court prioritized deciding the real controversies on merits while acknowledging the plaintiff's delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts