Ajit Udhavrao Bawle vs Udhav Anantrao Bawle and oth. — 160/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1. Status: Amended Plaint. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA110001962018
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
191/2018
Filing Date
13-04-2018
Registration No
160/2018
Registration Date
13-04-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajit Udhavrao Bawle
Adv. Pete Ramchandra S
Respondent(s)
Udhav Anantrao Bawle and oth.
Mahananda Udhav Bawle
Adv. Jagtap Madhav R
Jyoti Vithal Sathe
Sitabai Waman Shinde
Adv. Salunke Govind R
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Amended Plaint
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 13-04-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 25-03-2026 | Amended Plaint |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 160/2018 - Ajit Udhavrao Bawle vs. Udhav Anantrao Bawle and Others Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint. The plaintiff is now permitted to add a declaration seeking to nullify sale-deed registration No.530/2015 dated 30.06.2015 in the prayer clause, which he had pleaded but inadvertently omitted from the relief section. The court found the proposed amendment does not change the suit's nature and will aid in deciding the real controversy on merits without multiplying proceedings. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 160/2018 - Ajit Udhavrao Bawle vs. Udhav Anantrao Bawle and Others Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint. The plaintiff is now permitted to add a declaration seeking to nullify sale-deed registration No.530/2015 dated 30.06.2015 in the prayer clause, which he had pleaded but inadvertently omitted from the relief section. The court found the proposed amendment does not change the suit's nature and will aid in deciding the real controversy on merits without multiplying proceedings. No costs imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts