Subhash Govindrao Yewate vs State of Maharashtra and oths. — 28/2019
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHLA110001892019
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
188/2019
Filing Date
22-03-2019
Registration No
28/2019
Registration Date
22-03-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subhash Govindrao Yewate
Adv. Mane Sunil T
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra and oths.
The Executive Engineer
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: L.A.R. No.28/2019 (Subhash v. State) The Joint Civil Judge granted respondent No.1's application to file a written statement despite missing the prescribed deadline after being served summons on 07/11/2019. The court found that CPC Order VIII Rule 1 provisions are directory rather than mandatory and can be relaxed in rare cases, particularly where denying the opportunity would cause irreparable harm to the respondent while causing no prejudice to the claimant in this compensation enhancement petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: L.A.R. No.28/2019 (Subhash v. State) The Joint Civil Judge granted respondent No.1's application to file a written statement despite missing the prescribed deadline after being served summons on 07/11/2019. The court found that CPC Order VIII Rule 1 provisions are directory rather than mandatory and can be relaxed in rare cases, particularly where denying the opportunity would cause irreparable harm to the respondent while causing no prejudice to the claimant in this compensation enhancement petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts