Suryakant Madhav Dudhbhate vs Prakash Vishwanath Lohar Advocate - Patil Tanaji R — 17/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7(1)(2). Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHLA110001792025

e-Filing Number

03-04-2025

Filing Number

177/2025

Filing Date

03-Apr-2025

Registration No

17/2025

Registration Date

03-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7(1)(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suryakant Madhav Dudhbhate

    Adv. Gaikwad Hemant V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prakash Vishwanath Lohar Advocate - Patil Tanaji R

  2. 2.Farukh Ahemad Abdul Khadar Deshmukh

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: SplCS No. 17/2025 The court allowed the defendant's application to produce a photocopy of the plaint from Regular Civil Suit No. 810/2022 as evidence in the temporary injunction proceedings, rejecting the plaintiff's objection that the document was unrelated to the present case. The court distinguished between production and proof of documents, noting that parties retain the opportunity to lead further evidence at trial. No order on costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  10. 23-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  11. 18-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  12. 26-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 26-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  14. 30-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  15. 01-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  16. 26-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  17. 08-Sep-2025

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  18. 08-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  19. 29-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 29-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  21. 23-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  22. 23-Jul-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  23. 22-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  24. 22-Jul-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  25. 26-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  26. 26-Jun-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  27. 07-May-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  28. 09-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

  29. 03-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 03-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SplCS No. 17/2025 The court allowed the defendant's application to produce a photocopy of the plaint from Regular Civil Suit No. 810/2022 as evidence in the temporary injunction proceedings, rejecting the plaintiff's objection that the document was unrelated to the present case. The court distinguished between production and proof of documents, noting that parties retain the opportunity to lead further evidence at trial. No order on costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case