Suryakant Madhav Dudhbhate vs Prakash Vishwanath Lohar Advocate - Patil Tanaji R — 17/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7(1)(2). Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHLA110001792025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

03-04-2025

Filing Number

177/2025

Filing Date

03-04-2025

Registration No

17/2025

Registration Date

03-04-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7(1)(2)

Petitioner(s)

Suryakant Madhav Dudhbhate

Adv. Gaikwad Hemant V

Respondent(s)

Prakash Vishwanath Lohar Advocate - Patil Tanaji R

Farukh Ahemad Abdul Khadar Deshmukh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga

20-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

07-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

20-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: SplCS No. 17/2025 The court allowed the defendant's application to produce a photocopy of the plaint from Regular Civil Suit No. 810/2022 as evidence in the temporary injunction proceedings, rejecting the plaintiff's objection that the document was unrelated to the present case. The court distinguished between production and proof of documents, noting that parties retain the opportunity to lead further evidence at trial. No order on costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SplCS No. 17/2025 The court allowed the defendant's application to produce a photocopy of the plaint from Regular Civil Suit No. 810/2022 as evidence in the temporary injunction proceedings, rejecting the plaintiff's objection that the document was unrelated to the present case. The court distinguished between production and proof of documents, noting that parties retain the opportunity to lead further evidence at trial. No order on costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case