Khaisar Pashamiya Deshmukh vs State of Maharashtra and oths. — 21/2019
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHLA110001552019
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
155/2019
Filing Date
14-03-2019
Registration No
21/2019
Registration Date
14-03-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Khaisar Pashamiya Deshmukh
Adv. Mane Sunil T
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra and oths.
The Executive Engineer
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: LAR 21/2019 & 26/2019 The petition filed by Khaisar Pashamiya Deshmukh concerning land acquisition compensation was dismissed. The court found significant inconsistencies and contradictions in the petitioner's testimony regarding land valuation, agricultural income, and supporting documentation. The petitioner failed to provide credible evidence for claims of annual income of one lakh rupees from the 1999-acquired land and could not substantiate the alleged land value. The court rejected the petition on 07/01/2026 by Assistant Civil Judge V.D. Bhosle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: LAR 21/2019 & 26/2019 The petition filed by Khaisar Pashamiya Deshmukh concerning land acquisition compensation was dismissed. The court found significant inconsistencies and contradictions in the petitioner's testimony regarding land valuation, agricultural income, and supporting documentation. The petitioner failed to provide credible evidence for claims of annual income of one lakh rupees from the 1999-acquired land and could not substantiate the alleged land value. The court rejected the petition on 07/01/2026 by Assistant Civil Judge V.D. Bhosle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts