Sharawan Madhav Dhole vs State of Maharashtra and oths. — 19/2019
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHLA110001532019
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
153/2019
Filing Date
14-03-2019
Registration No
19/2019
Registration Date
14-03-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sharawan Madhav Dhole
Adv. Mane Sunil T
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra and oths.
The Executive Engineer
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
In L.A.R. No.19/2019 (compensation enhancement petition), the court granted respondent No.1's application to file a late written statement, finding that the delay was excusable as the department had not provided required information. The court held that CCP O-VIII R-1 provisions are directory rather than mandatory and can be relaxed in exceptional cases, and allowing the written statement would cause no prejudice to the claimant while denying it would cause irreparable loss to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In L.A.R. No.19/2019 (compensation enhancement petition), the court granted respondent No.1's application to file a late written statement, finding that the delay was excusable as the department had not provided required information. The court held that CCP O-VIII R-1 provisions are directory rather than mandatory and can be relaxed in exceptional cases, and allowing the written statement would cause no prejudice to the claimant while denying it would cause irreparable loss to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts