Sardarmiya Hannanmiya Deshmukh vs The State of Mahrashtra Through Collector Latur and oths. — 13/2019
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 18. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
L.A.R. - Land Acquisition Reference
CNR: MHLA110001472019
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
147/2019
Filing Date
14-03-2019
Registration No
13/2019
Registration Date
14-03-2019
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sardarmiya Hannanmiya Deshmukh
Adv. Mane Sunil T
Respondent(s)
The State of Mahrashtra Through Collector Latur and oths.
The Executive Engineer Nimna Terna Kalwa Dept. No. -2 Latur. Dist. Latur.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 11-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 13/2019 This Land Acquisition case involved petitioner Sardarmiya Hannanmiya Deshmukh challenging land acquisition proceedings by the State of Maharashtra. Cross-examination testimony was recorded wherein the witness admitted to filing false affidavits to claim inflated compensation benefits by submitting fabricated crop production bills and electricity bills for lands that were not actually irrigated or cultivated as claimed. The court found the witness's testimony unreliable due to these admitted false statements. The petition was dismissed and cross-examination was completed without further arguments on 29/10/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 13/2019 This Land Acquisition case involved petitioner Sardarmiya Hannanmiya Deshmukh challenging land acquisition proceedings by the State of Maharashtra. Cross-examination testimony was recorded wherein the witness admitted to filing false affidavits to claim inflated compensation benefits by submitting fabricated crop production bills and electricity bills for lands that were not actually irrigated or cultivated as claimed. The court found the witness's testimony unreliable due to these admitted false statements. The petition was dismissed and cross-examination was completed without further arguments on 29/10/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts