Gorakhnath Amruta Kale And Others 5 vs Mohan Amruta Kale And Others 8 Advocate - Sabnis Chandrashekhar J — 1000215/2010
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7Rule1,2. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA110001332014
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
1100215/2010
Filing Date
14-02-2014
Registration No
1000215/2010
Registration Date
30-06-2010
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gorakhnath Amruta Kale And Others 5
Adv. Sabnis Satish A
Vandanabai wo. Gorakhnath Kale
Adv. Sabnis Anantrao B
Ravi so. Gorakhnath Kale
Adv. Sabnis Anantrao B
Chitrasen so.Gorakhnath Kale
Adv. Sabnis Anantrao B
Kamdhenu wo.Suresh Sarvade
Adv. Sabnis Anantrao B
Bharat Gorakhnath Kale
Adv. Sabnis Anantrao B
Respondent(s)
Mohan Amruta Kale And Others 8 Advocate - Sabnis Chandrashekhar J
Sudhakar so.Amrata @ Aamari Kale....died
Adv. Sabnis Chandrashekhar J
Sagarbai wo.Sudhakar Kale
Adv. Sabnis Chandrashekhar J
Chatrughana Sudhakar Kale
Adv. Sabnis Chandrashekhar J
Sow. Sunanda wo Shivaji Kasbe
Adv. Sabnis Chandrashekhar J
Sumitra Dharmaji Ture
Adv. Sabnis Chandrashekhar J
Supriya Sudhakar Kale Ug Sagarbai wo.Sudhakar Kale
Adv. Sabnis Chandrashekhar J
Suvarna Sudhakar Kale Ug.Sagarbai wo.Sudhakar Kale
Adv. Sabnis Chandrashekhar J
3 Sulabai wo. Vithal Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 18-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: In this property dispute case (1000215/2010), the court examined the testimony of the plaintiff's witness regarding disputed land in Nilanga. The witness testified that Mohan (the defendant) is his cousin, and that their father purchased certain plots of land (measuring plots 36 and 9 miles). The witness clarified he had no objection to properties Mohan held in Nilanga, and that he was not born when the original land purchases occurred. After completion of cross-examination and re-examination, the court accepted the witness's testimony on 26/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: In this property dispute case (1000215/2010), the court examined the testimony of the plaintiff's witness regarding disputed land in Nilanga. The witness testified that Mohan (the defendant) is his cousin, and that their father purchased certain plots of land (measuring plots 36 and 9 miles). The witness clarified he had no objection to properties Mohan held in Nilanga, and that he was not born when the original land purchases occurred. After completion of cross-examination and re-examination, the court accepted the witness's testimony on 26/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts