Bank Of Maharashtra Through Its Br.Manager Yadagiri Papachary Guntoju vs Omkar Dagdu Birnale Advocate - Joshi Manoj P — 12/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHLA110000952022
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
92/2022
Filing Date
11-02-2022
Registration No
12/2022
Registration Date
11-02-2022
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bank Of Maharashtra Through Its Br.Manager Yadagiri Papachary Guntoju
Adv. Naik Nandkishor D
Respondent(s)
Omkar Dagdu Birnale Advocate - Joshi Manoj P
Dagdu Nagnathappa Birnale
Adv. Joshi Manoj P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
List of Witness
List of Witness
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-02-2026 | List of Witness |
| 27-01-2026 | List of Witness |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 12/2022 The court set-aside the order dated 15.01.2025 that proceeded with the suit without the defendants' written statement. The defendants, who live out of station and did not receive suit summons, were unable to file their written statement due to non-receipt of material documents and because defendant No.2 is elderly and ill. The court found that in the interest of justice, defendants must be afforded an opportunity to file their written statement and present their defense in this bank recovery suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 12/2022 The court set-aside the order dated 15.01.2025 that proceeded with the suit without the defendants' written statement. The defendants, who live out of station and did not receive suit summons, were unable to file their written statement due to non-receipt of material documents and because defendant No.2 is elderly and ill. The court found that in the interest of justice, defendants must be afforded an opportunity to file their written statement and present their defense in this bank recovery suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts