Ajaykumar Babrauwan Makane vs Faijoddin Daudsab Mulla Advocate - Pete Ramchandra S — 1/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1,2. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHLA110000452018
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
44/2018
Filing Date
30-01-2018
Registration No
1/2018
Registration Date
30-01-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Nilanga
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajaykumar Babrauwan Makane
Adv. Solanke Dattatry B_LAPA82
Respondent(s)
Faijoddin Daudsab Mulla Advocate - Pete Ramchandra S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Nilanga
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In this civil suit for cancellation of sale deed (Registration No. 219/2017), the court allowed the plaintiff Ajaykumar's application to produce additional documents (RTGS receipts, payment receipts, and bank account extracts) that were not filed with the original plaint. Although defendants objected citing late filing without stated reasons, the court permitted production in the interest of justice, noting the documents appear relevant to the disputed property claim. No order on costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In this civil suit for cancellation of sale deed (Registration No. 219/2017), the court allowed the plaintiff Ajaykumar's application to produce additional documents (RTGS receipts, payment receipts, and bank account extracts) that were not filed with the original plaint. Although defendants objected citing late filing without stated reasons, the court permitted production in the interest of justice, noting the documents appear relevant to the disputed property claim. No order on costs was made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts