Rukminbai Ram Hande vs Sulubai Tulshiram Shinde — 1289/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/o7rule1&2. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA090042952023
e-Filing Number
11-10-2023
Filing Number
2090/2023
Filing Date
12-Oct-2023
Registration No
1289/2023
Registration Date
13-Oct-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir
Judge
1-1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
Last updated 24-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rukminbai Ram Hande
Adv. SABANE DEVIDAS AMBADAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sulubai Tulshiram Shinde
-
2.Suresh Tulshiram Shinde
-
3.Umakant Tulshiram Shinde
-
4.Shobha Shivaji Khutekar
-
5.Sangita Devidas Halburge
Case History
-
15-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Compliance
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
13-Apr-2026
Reply/Say
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
20-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
11-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
12-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
12-Dec-2025
Reply/Say
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
02-Dec-2025
Reply/Say
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
04-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
09-Oct-2025
Reply/Say
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
22-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
02-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
12-Aug-2025
Compliance
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
19-Jul-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
1st Jt. Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
10-May-2025
Lok-Nyayalaya
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
22-Mar-2025
Lok-Nyayalaya
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
14-Dec-2024
Lok-Nyayalaya
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
28-Sep-2024
Lok-Nyayalaya
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
27-Jul-2024
Lok-Nyayalaya
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
10-May-2024
Lok-Nyayalaya
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
03-Mar-2024
Compromise
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
26-Feb-2024
Order on Exhibit
Case 1289/2023 - Rukminbai v. Sulubai and Others The court adjourned the case and directed notice to all defendants. Though plaintiff Rukminbai, defendant No. 1 Sulubai, and defendant No. 5 Sangita proposed a compromise to partition property (Survey No. 48/1, 0H.81R), the court found it premature to conclude whether the property is self-acquired. All parties must be heard before the compromise can be accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Feb-2024
Compromise
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
15-Feb-2024
Order on Exhibit
-
15-Feb-2024
Compromise
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
05-Feb-2024
Appearance
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
20-Jan-2024
Appearance
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
15-Jan-2024
Appearance
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
20-Nov-2023
Compromise
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
06-Nov-2023
Compromise
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
16-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1289/2023
Case 1289/2023 - Rukminbai v. Sulubai and Others The court adjourned the case and directed notice to all defendants. Though plaintiff Rukminbai, defendant No. 1 Sulubai, and defendant No. 5 Sangita proposed a compromise to partition property (Survey No. 48/1, 0H.81R), the court found it premature to conclude whether the property is self-acquired. All parties must be heard before the compromise can be accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts