The State of Maharashtra vs Jayesh Dnyandev Veta — 970/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA090032702024

Filing Number

3269/2024

Filing Date

06-Nov-2024

Registration No

970/2024

Registration Date

06-Nov-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir

Judge

2-2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

455

Police Station

Rural Police Station Udgir

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jayesh Dnyandev Veta

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State vs. Jayesh Dnyandev Veta (970/2024) The Judicial Magistrate F.C., Udgir, stopped the criminal proceeding against Jayesh Dnyandev Veta under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973, as the Complaint Agent report remained unfiled despite considerable time elapsed. The court found no fruitful purpose in further pendency and ordered the seized liquor property disposed by the District Collector (Excise), Latur per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  6. 08-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 970/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State vs. Jayesh Dnyandev Veta (970/2024) The Judicial Magistrate F.C., Udgir, stopped the criminal proceeding against Jayesh Dnyandev Veta under Section 258 of the CrPC, 1973, as the Complaint Agent report remained unfiled despite considerable time elapsed. The court found no fruitful purpose in further pendency and ordered the seized liquor property disposed by the District Collector (Excise), Latur per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case