The State of Maharashtra vs Anil sangram Kamble — 954/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA090032492024

Filing Number

3249/2024

Filing Date

05-Nov-2024

Registration No

954/2024

Registration Date

05-Nov-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir

Judge

2-2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

468

Police Station

Rural Police Station Udgir

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anil sangram Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of S.C.C. No. 954/2024 (State vs. Anil Sangram Kamble): The Judicial Magistrate stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 in a liquor prohibition case (Section 65(a)(e) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949) because the Complaint Agent's report was never filed. Finding no purpose in further delay, the court disposed of the case and ordered seized liquor sent to the District Collector (Excise), Latur for lawful disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir

  6. 07-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 954/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of S.C.C. No. 954/2024 (State vs. Anil Sangram Kamble): The Judicial Magistrate stopped proceedings under Section 281 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 in a liquor prohibition case (Section 65(a)(e) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949) because the Complaint Agent's report was never filed. Finding no purpose in further delay, the court disposed of the case and ordered seized liquor sent to the District Collector (Excise), Latur for lawful disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case