Shri. Ateek Ekbal Parkote vs Shaikh Shafiyoddin Yusufali — 571/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA090021372022
Filing Number
2137/2022
Filing Date
28-Jun-2022
Registration No
571/2022
Registration Date
28-Jun-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Udgir
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri. Ateek Ekbal Parkote
Adv. Biradar Manjur N
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shaikh Shafiyoddin Yusufali
Case History
-
18-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jun-2026
Evidence
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
19-May-2026
Evidence
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
26-Dec-2025
Evidence
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
12-Jun-2025
Evidence
3rd Jt. Cjjd JMFC Udgir
-
28-Apr-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
4th Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC Udgir
-
11-Feb-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
4th Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC Udgir
-
23-Dec-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
4th Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC Udgir
-
22-Oct-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
4th Jt. Civil Judge and JMFC Udgir
-
12-Sep-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
29-Jul-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
18-Jun-2024
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: SCC No. 571/2022 Outcome: The complainant's application seeking interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 was rejected on 18 June 2024. The court held that interim compensation orders cannot be passed mechanically; the complainant must establish a prima facie case while the court evaluates both parties' merits, considering transaction nature, party relationship, and accused's paying capacity. The application was rejected as Section 143-A is discretionary, not mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Jun-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
16-May-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
12-Apr-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
14-Mar-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
15-Feb-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
09-Dec-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
30-Nov-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
06-Nov-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
09-Oct-2023
Evidence
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
11-Sep-2023
Evidence
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
04-Aug-2023
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
11-Jul-2023
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
17-May-2023
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
18-Apr-2023
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
04-Mar-2023
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
06-Feb-2023
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
17-Jan-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
28-Dec-2022
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
28-Nov-2022
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
14-Nov-2022
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
12-Sep-2022
Order on Exhibit
-
12-Sep-2022
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
12-Aug-2022
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
12-Jul-2022
Appearance
2nd Jt.Civil JudgeJ.D. J.M.F.C. Udgir
-
30-Jun-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 571/2022
Case Summary: SCC No. 571/2022 Outcome: The complainant's application seeking interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 was rejected on 18 June 2024. The court held that interim compensation orders cannot be passed mechanically; the complainant must establish a prima facie case while the court evaluates both parties' merits, considering transaction nature, party relationship, and accused's paying capacity. The application was rejected as Section 143-A is discretionary, not mandatory. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts